When Alternative Healthcare Equals Noncompliance

Tempted To Noncompliance
Today’s post focuses on the penchant of a significant fraction of the population to choose the offerings of charlatans and shamans over those of scientific healthcare, leading all too often to noncompliance with medical treatment.
This excerpt from Prayer, Faith Is Fine, published in the Swazi Observer characterizes the problem.
Commentary
While this story is set in Swaziland, it is not difficult to imagine variations taking place throughout the world, including those countries with far more resources in the areas of healthcare, communication, and education. The thriving enterprises of mysticism, quackery, pseudoscience, and straightforward scams in the U.S. is testimony that national borders are no protection from such dangers.
To read this article is to be reminded that patient noncompliance is caused not only by miscommunication, side-effects of treatment, medication fatigue, and other miscues within the patient-clinician-interface but also by patients who opt out of the system of scientific healthcare altogether, preferentially placing their beliefs in one of the many available alternatives.
While I am aware of the limitations of scientific healthcare and willing to accept the possibility that some other system could prove as beneficial or more beneficial to mankind, I see little compelling evidence indicating that such a theoretical system currently exists. Until such evidence is revealed, I maintain that a fundamental requirement for compliance is the patient’s participation in the best available scientifically supported medical care and, consequently, that those of us involved in providing that medical care have the responsibility not only to practice our techniques carefully and skillfully but also to unapologetically promote the proven effectiveness of those techniques and insist that alternative healthcare methods similarly back up their claims of effectiveness.
The complete article from the Swazi Observer can be found at ~Prayer, Faith Is Fine~
Related Posts:

Religious Practices and Patient Compliance
Impact of Theology on Adherence To Treatment

Source:
Bashir Qureshi, FRCGP, Diabetes in Ramadan J R Soc Med. 2002 October; 95(10): 489–490.
Managing Diabetic Patients Practicing Devotional Fasting and Other Religious Behaviors
This article centers on pragmatic clinical tips on the medical management of diabetic Muslims celebrating Ramadan.
A brief summary of the relevant customs of Ramadan is followed by “Ten Points Towards Improving Diabetes Care In Muslim Patients.”1 These examples from that list are representative:
#5 In Ramadan, a person with type 2 diabetes can take a sulphonylurea at the end of the fast, with the evening meal started within 30 minutes. Advise not to miss the sehri (before sunrise) meal so as to avoid hypoglycaemia later in the day. Repaglinide (NovoNorm) can be particularly useful, since it need only be taken when a meal is eaten, therefore no change in drug therapy will be required in Ramadan. A meal must be eaten within 15 minutes
Other recommendations are less specific to diabetes or Ramadan; Point #8, for example, advises that:
Commentary
While this article focuses on a relatively narrow audience, clinicians with limited knowledge of Muslim practices who are providing care for diabetics who are followers of that religion, its readily apparent implications regarding compliance extend far beyond the treatment of a given disease or methods for dealing with those who conform to a single set of theological doctrines. The message to healthcare professionals is clear:
Footnotes
- Only nine points are listed under the heading, “Ten Points Towards Improving Diabetes Care In Muslim Patients.” [back]
Related Posts:
- Effect Of Targeted Interventions On Patient Compliance With Screening
- Connection Between Knowledge and Compliance Unclear
- Effect Of Noncompliance On Timing Of Treatment Recommendations For Type 2 Diabetes
- Importance Of Individual Variations Over Time In Diabetes Treatment
- Caregivers And Patient Compliance

Addressing Cultural Threats To Health
Gordidto Doesn’t Mean Healthy

Gordidto Doesn’t Mean Healthy1 is targeted toward Latino parents, offering information about the dangers of obesity in children and methods for feeding their children nutritiously without forgoing traditional dishes.
As the Publishers Weekly blurb notes,
Commentary
Iconoculture, a market research firm, regularly tracks cultural phenomenon that affect economic trends and purchases of good and services. Their take on Gordidto Doesn’t Mean Healthy is that it’s part of a much larger movement within the Latino population of the United States to maintain the essence of their cultural heritage while eliminating certain aspects that are potentially detrimental.
This combination of respect to tradition, sensitivity to an ethnic group, and efforts to improve health being recommended to retailers seems a worthwhile model for healthcare as well.
Footnotes
- Gordidto Doesn’t Mean Healthy is available at Amazon and other bookstores [back]
Related Posts:









