<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Today&#8217;s Treatment Adherence Paradigm Must Be Destroyed – Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alignmap.com/2009/06/25/why-todays-treatment-adherence-paradigm-must-be-destroyed-%e2%80%93-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alignmap.com/2009/06/25/why-todays-treatment-adherence-paradigm-must-be-destroyed-%e2%80%93-part-2/</link>
	<description>Beyond Compliance, Adherence, &#38; Concordance - Supporting The Patient's Implementation Of Optimal Treatment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Showalter, MD</title>
		<link>http://alignmap.com/2009/06/25/why-todays-treatment-adherence-paradigm-must-be-destroyed-%e2%80%93-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Showalter, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alignmap.com/?p=1349#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>My reading of the FAME study is congruent with this summary from a review in Medscape, &lt;a href=&quot;http://cme.medscape.com/viewarticle/549907&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Medical Adherence: America&#039;s &quot;Other Drug Problem&quot;&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The study is very useful in that it adds to current understanding of the reasons for poor rates of medication adherence in older adults. However, we have to note that even in this setting, in which medications are free and medical care is accessible and of excellent quality, medication adherence was poor. The study supports the view that a multilayered intervention can improve medication adherence and underscores the value of pharmacists as key providers of patient counseling in correcting poor patient adherence. The interventions also are potentially generalizable. Despite some cost considerations, medication blister packs can be made for individual patients, and pharmacists are available, skilled, and interested in providing specific counseling about drugs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s been clear for some time that the complex, labor-intensive interventions can be helpful in improving compliance. FAME appears to be another example of this principle. Moreover, there are special conditions (eg, no cost meds, Hawthorne Effect) in play.

That  &quot;multi-layered&quot; (AKA &quot;shotgun&quot;) approaches are  successful in improving compliance does not confirm the current treatment adherence concepts  but only demonstrates that if everything possible is done for certain groups of patients, some of them will take higher proportions of their  prescribed  meds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My reading of the FAME study is congruent with this summary from a review in Medscape, <a href="http://cme.medscape.com/viewarticle/549907" rel="nofollow">Medical Adherence: America&#8217;s &#8220;Other Drug Problem&#8221;</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The study is very useful in that it adds to current understanding of the reasons for poor rates of medication adherence in older adults. However, we have to note that even in this setting, in which medications are free and medical care is accessible and of excellent quality, medication adherence was poor. The study supports the view that a multilayered intervention can improve medication adherence and underscores the value of pharmacists as key providers of patient counseling in correcting poor patient adherence. The interventions also are potentially generalizable. Despite some cost considerations, medication blister packs can be made for individual patients, and pharmacists are available, skilled, and interested in providing specific counseling about drugs.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s been clear for some time that the complex, labor-intensive interventions can be helpful in improving compliance. FAME appears to be another example of this principle. Moreover, there are special conditions (eg, no cost meds, Hawthorne Effect) in play.</p>
<p>That  &#8220;multi-layered&#8221; (AKA &#8220;shotgun&#8221;) approaches are  successful in improving compliance does not confirm the current treatment adherence concepts  but only demonstrates that if everything possible is done for certain groups of patients, some of them will take higher proportions of their  prescribed  meds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armando</title>
		<link>http://alignmap.com/2009/06/25/why-todays-treatment-adherence-paradigm-must-be-destroyed-%e2%80%93-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4243</link>
		<dc:creator>Armando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alignmap.com/?p=1349#comment-4243</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at the FAME study (The Federal Study of Adherence to Medications in the Elderly)? This JAMA study showed &gt;35% increase in adherence, with corresponding possitive outcomes....check it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at the FAME study (The Federal Study of Adherence to Medications in the Elderly)? This JAMA study showed &gt;35% increase in adherence, with corresponding possitive outcomes&#8230;.check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

